Two more stores to close in Midtown Shopping Center

January 23, 2008

As if the Martone/Dalis “Midtown” Shopping Center in the northeast quadrant of Granby Street and Little Creek Road doesn’t have enough vacant store fronts,  today, I heard, from a reliable source, of two more closings. Payless ShoeSource and Simply Fashions will be closing their doors shortly. The Footlocker Store closed its doors for good on Monday of this week.


Why is Wards Corner consistenly on “the back burner”?

January 23, 2008

Below is a letter penned by Wards Corner resident, Joan Griffey.

Dear Mayor Fraim,

The 2004 Wards Corner Comprehensive Plan was proposed and financed by City Council with a quarter million dollars of taxpayer funds. What positive remarks will you include in your State of the City report concerning progress on this plan and the Wards Corner Business District?

In four years, the plan has not delivered on various items:

  • There are currently 15 empty storefronts which were supposed to be occupied with family friendly businesses
  • A badly painted crosswalk was installed instead of a brick crosswalk
  • New mast-arm traffic poles were planned to reduce overhead wiring mishmash
  • Elimination of blight was supposed to be the focus
  • Updated buildings have not been addressed
  • A parking garage has not been delivered
  • Housing was supposed to be built above storefronts to generate community living

Last Tuesday, nearly 100 Norfolk voters assembled to discuss our frustration and the rank discrimination by our Council and City Manager towards the Wards Corner section of Norfolk. We voiced plans to continue to meet and energize our civic leagues for fair treatment for Wards Corner. Since 1997, the WCPartnership, in 2000 the WC Taskforce, in 2003, the WC Comprehensive Plan all have made aware our problems with blight, crime and public safety, esthetics decline , downturn of business activity and a “war zone” image as a gateway to downtown. These reports have been ignored and pushed aside, oblivious to the very people we elected as our leaders.

On our city website, the mission states that the City of Norfolk shall provide leadership and direction responsive to the needs and desires of all citizens of Norfolk. This does not exclude Wards Corner citizens from leadership to improve our quality of life and civic opportunities. Discrimination exists when certain areas of the city are given preference to Wards Corner (i.e., $11 million for frivolous fountains in Town Point Park where people go to look at the River, and the St Paul’s Quadrant, and a skateboard park and new development near the light rail stations).

Why is the City not interested in developing Wards Corner area? The city is doing nothing to encourage development. Promoting downtown is fine, but not at the sacrifice of the rest of the City. Are you expecting to concentrate misplaced and indigent peoples in downtown to our geographical area? This problem needs to be addressed. Perhaps our only recourse is to approach the news media for help to call attention to Council’s neglect. Why is Wards Corner consistently on “the back burner” when development is discussed?

Wards Corner citizens expect our leaders to step up and represent us. We are waiting for you to deliver on your promises and “stick to the task”! Wards Corner First.

Sincerely,
Joan S. Griffey


A letter to Councilman Williams

January 23, 2008

Yesterday, I received from Laura Thom a copy of the following letter to Ward 1 Councilman Don Williams:

Letter to Don Williams

January 21, 2008

Councilman Donald L. Williams

809 W. Ocean View Ave.

Norfolk, VA  23503

Dear Councilman Williams:

Wards Corner used to be a great area.  “Times Square of the South” it was once called.  No more.  This area, which is the main gateway to the City of Norfolk from points north, is in a state of disrepair and neglect. 

Finally, after years of losing business after business[1] and watching the further deterioration of already substandard housing in several Wards Corner locales[2], on November 21, 2004, Norfolk City Council adopted the Wards Corner Comprehensive Plan.  While city council continues to spend thousands of dollars enticing developers to downtown, and is now focusing on St. Paul’s quadrant (and what about  the $11 million fountains slated for Waterside!), not a move has been made to begin fulfillment of the Wards Corner plan.  Council members like to say their hands are tied because of the revisions to eminent domain.  But this is a smoke screen; revisions to eminent domain did not occur until 2007—2 ½ years after Council approved of the Wards Corner Comprehensive Plan.

Residents and businesses of Wards Corner spoke loudly and clearly last Tuesday evening.  We are just plain tired of the discriminatory practices demonstrated by our elected officials.  Moreover, we are prepared to take decisive action to institute changes of City leadership unless council members begin to right the wrongs, end the neglect, and focus on implementing the Wards Corner Comprehensive Plan –not next year, not next fiscal year, but now.  It’s unfortunate that the eminent domain legislation will make this plan more difficult to accomplish, but Council will simply have to overcome the resultant obstacles.  I respectfully request that you, as our Ward 1 representative, take heed and pay attention to Wards Corner Now.

          

Sincerely,

   

Laura Thom


[1]  Over the years, Wards Corner has lost the beautiful stone Hofheimer building in favor of a generic Walgreens. Regino’s Italian restaurant, a Wards Corner landmark, closed then re-opened far down E. Little Creek Rd., Mary Barnett’s moved to Riverview, Naas Bakery moved to Tidewater Dr.   The space formerly occupied by People’s Drug has been vacant for years.  Uncle Louie’s is gone, so are: Abel Art Supplies, The Toy Works, Herschler’s Children’s Shoe Store, LaVogue, Rice’s Department Store, The Fabric Hut,  Smith & Welton’s, Lottie’s Shoes… the list goes on.   We even had a bowling alley!     

[2] Note the crime statistics in Denby Park and the Texas Streets. 


January Civic Connection Updates

January 22, 2008

The Civic Connection is produced by the City of Norfolk on a monthly basis. Below are some highlights from January’s edition.

Recent Action by City Council

  • Approved the concept of a memorandum of understanding between the City and the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority and authorized the City Manager to negotiate the agreement. It will establish a program to help the City address blighted areas through NRHA. Council also designated the first neighborhoods to be included in the program: Denby Park, Monticello Village, and Oakdale Farms.
  • Approved an ordinance for the possible future use of surveillance cameras in Project Focus neighborhoods (currently Denby Park, Olde Huntersville and Pleasant Avenue in East Ocean View. The ordinance Council outlines the process by which neighborhoods or the police chief can request the installation of cameras and where the cameras would be placed. The purposes of the cameras would be to deter crime, assist in the apprehension of known suspects, and to reduce public fear in perceived higher-crime areas. The next step is the issuance of a Request for Proposal for a contractor to help the City investigate technology and issues regarding the placement of cameras. Council would hold a public hearing prior to implementing any program in a neighborhood.
  • Established “rental inspection districts” for each of the three Project Focus areas (Denby Park, Olde Huntersville, and the Pleasant Avenue area of East Ocean View). The Department of Neighborhood Preservation is in charge of implementing the rental inspection program and notifying renters and owners.
    The program allows the City to inspect all of the units in a property with fewer than 10 units. For a multiple family (10 or more units) complex in the initial and periodic inspections the codes compliance office shall inspect only a sampling of the total dwelling units of not less than two and not more than ten percent of the dwelling units However If the codes compliance office determines upon inspection of the sampling of dwelling units that there are violations of the building code that affect the safe decent and sanitary living conditions for the tenants of such multiple family complex the codes compliance office may inspect as many dwelling units as necessary to enforce the building code. Once a property is found in compliance, it cannot be re-inspected for four years except at the request of a tenant.

Contracts – Notice to Proceed
Wards Corner Signal / ADA Improvements
Contractor: Highway Electric, Inc.
NTP Date: December 3, 2007


Norfolk Tea Party 2 Out of Focus?

January 20, 2008

On a cold, rainy and dreary Saturday morning, The Norfolk Tea Party 2 held another Town Hall Meeting. The message that came out of that meeting was as cloudy as the weather outside. The Norfolk Tea Party 2’s past success has been based on doing it’s homework, having its facts straight, and sticking to the issue of a high Norfolk real estate tax rate. Half truths, fuzzy facts were spewed by many in attendance. (We have at times accussed the City of the same thing. We are better than this.) None of this was necessary. The budget of this city is in a written document. Spending by Norfolk is documented; therefore, facts are readily available to the Tea Party if the leadership had been willing to do their homework.  Clearly apparent yesterday was another agenda at work; an agenda to remove the City Manager. The City Manager serves at the pleasure of Council. Obviously, since she is still the City Manger, most of the Council must be satisfied with her performance. And why shouldn’t they be satisfied? Most of the wards in the city are recipients of economic development projects and spending for city services that are improving their citizens’ quality of life.

The geographic make up of the attendees was mostly folks living outside of the Westside of Norfolk. The Greater Wards Corner Partnership area was sparsely represented at the Town Hall Meeting. We in the Greater Wards Corner Area have bigger fish to fry. We do not need to expend our energy in a bitch session, when we have not cleaned up our own mess caused by a lack of proper representation.  The Norfolk Tea Party 2 will not get our Comprehensive plan off of first base; only through our efforts and attention to the task at hand will.


Meeting Reminder – Norfolk Tea Party 2

January 17, 2008

The Norfolk Tea Party 2 will be holding a meeting to conduct a survey on taxes and on the City Council’s, Mayor’s and City Manager’s performance on Saturday, January 19th at the Banque, 1849 E. Little Creek Road, 9:00 am. There will be no Greater Wards Corner Partnership Meeting this Saturday. Please try to attend and alert members of your civic leagues.


Vacant building registration

January 16, 2008

Back on September 23, 2007 we posted here about a Virginian-Pilot article which addresses the negative affects of abandoned housing in Norfolk and Portsmouth. We followed that post with another, on November 28, 2007, about how Norfolk was going to lobby the state for tools to combat vacant houses.

Virginia Code currently allows Cities, by ordinance, to require the owners of buildings that have been vacant for a continuous period of 12 months or more to register such buildings on an annual basis and may impose an annual registration fee not to exceed $25. Failure to register results in a $50 civil penalty. Failure to register in conservation and rehabilitation districts or in other areas designated as blighted results in a civil penalty of not more than $250. Norfolk does have a vacant building registry ordinance and it is in line with the above penalties.

SB162 is a proposed bill currently in the Senate Committee on Local Government . Its sister bill in the House, HB1210 (proposed by Delegate Ken Melvin, who represents a part of Norfolk), is in the House Counties, Cities and Towns Committee. They propose increasing the $50 penalty to a $500 dollar penalty and increasing the $250 dollar maximum penalty in conservation and rehabilitation areas to a $2500 maximum.

Currently, the cost of maintaining and policing a vacant building registry is prohibitive. The City could spend hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars chasing down violators with the end result being a $50 or $500 penalty. Hopefully the proposed changes will make having a registry more viable and in turn reduce the number of vacant, blighted buildings.


Comprehensive Plan meeting recap

January 15, 2008

Tonight’s meeting at the Workforce Center was a success that none of its organizers predicted.  With at least 100 people in attendance it was clear that the citizens of the Wards Corner Partnership area are unhappy with their representation on City Council.  Various civic leaders were in attendance and many voiced their dismay with the lack of action in the Wards Corner area.  Crime is soaring, blight is damaging our neighborhoods, and the best reaction we can get from the City is that we may get new crosswalks if their is money in the budget.

The frustration level was high as there are people who have been working on the same issues that confront us today for almost a decade.  People are disappointed that the City dropped the ball on moving forward with the Wards Corner Comprehensive Plan before the General Assembly took eminent domain away and they are equally disappointed that the city refuses to move forward with the plan now.

Crime was a large part of the discussion as most in attendance felt that the redevelopment of East Beach caused much of the crime and blight to relocate to the Denby Park neighborhood.  With reports that the St. Pauls Quadrant is where the city will be spending most of its money and resources, there is a great fear that once again the crime and blight of that area will end up in the Wards Corner Partnership area.

It was pointed out that there are five elected city officials that represent the Wards Corner Partnership area and none of them are champions for the area.  It was explicitly stated that most of the Partnership Area is represented by the Ward 1 councilman and that he is ostensibly ineffective in bringing home the bacon to the Ward.

The meeting was closed with a plan to meet again at the Workforce Center on January 29, 2008 at 7:00pm at which time an action plan will be formulated.  Frustration is high among the citizens, but optimism is causing the citizens to work for change.


General Assembly Update: Payday Loans

January 15, 2008

The Virginia Payday Loan Act was first adopted by the Virginia General Assembly in 2002 and exempted the industry from the prior 36-percent interest rate cap. Virginia caps the interest rate on a one-week loan at 780 percent and 390 percent for two-week loans. As bad as the interest rate may be, the worst part is the debt trap that the borrower gets caught in. Payday loans are designed to trap the borrower into repeat loans.¹

There are currently a number of bills filed in the General Assembly attempting to “fix” the Payday Loan issues in Virginia. I have attempted to summarize them, provide links to them, and let you know where those bills are in their journey through the General Assembly.

HB12, HB249, HB1377, HB1404, SB24, SB279, SB238, and SB670 all propose limiting the annual interest rate for Payday Loans at 36%.

HB12, HB249, HB1377, HB1404: In House Commerce and Labor Committee
SB24, SB279, SB238, SB670: In Senate Commerce and Labor Committee

SB25, SB156, SB278, and HB730 propose repealing the Payday Loan Act entirely with effective dates of July 1, 2008, July 1, 2010, January 1, 2009, and July 1, 2010 respectively.

SB25, SB156, SB27: In Senate Commerce and Labor Committee
HB730: In House Commerce and Labor Committee

HB176 Requires the creation of an internet accessible statewide database of payday loans.   Lenders would be required to query the database to determine whether the borrower is eligible for the loan. The database would be paid for by a 50 cent fee added to each payday loan. HB1103, HB1352, and SB588 would create the same database as above as well as an Extended Payment Plan; they would change the minimum term of a payday loan from seven to 14 days; require a one day waiting period between the repayment of a loan and making a new loan; and other tweaks.

HB176, HB1103, HB1352: In House Commerce and Labor Committee
SB588: In Senate Commerce and Labor Committee

HB189 gives localities the power to regulate the interest rate and number of payday loans allowed within their jurisdiction.

HB189: In House Commerce and Labor Committee

Thanks to Waldo Jaquith for creating Richmond Sunlight, an invaluable tool in tracking these bills and the Virginia General Assembly.


Greater Wards Corner Comprehensive Plan meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 15th at 7 pm

January 14, 2008

The Greater Wards Corner Partnership will hold a special meeting Tuesday, January 15th at 7:00 pm at the Norfolk Workforce Development Center 201 E. Little Creek Road (next to Kroger) room 202, to discuss moving the The Greater Wards Corner Comprehensive Plan forward. All concerned citizens are welcome and encouraged to attend.


We are not alone

January 10, 2008

Tonight at the Ocean View Coordinating Committee the President of the Bayview Civic League read aloud his Civic League’s letter to the Mayor. We in the Greater Wards Corner Partnership are not alone in our feelings about our City Council’s performance. The letter follows:

Bayview Civic League’s Letter to the Mayor


Councilwoman Whibley suggests skateboard park for Wards Corner area

January 9, 2008

Yesterday, as Norfolk City Council rejected the idea for a skateboard park in downtown near Harbor Park, Councilwoman Whibley recommended the park for a troubled area of Wards Corner. The Pilot Online quotes Theresa Whibley as saying,

“Why not build one at Wards Corner?

“We’re looking for a way to clear some of that area out. It’s a great central location,” she said. “They’re looking for a rec center out there, and we don’t have the money for one. So we could start with this.”

I don’t ever remember the Wards Corner Partnership asking for a rec center in Denby Park, but a skate park could be a wonderful addition to the Comprehensive plan that is already on the table. The Wards Corner Partnership still demands that the Texas Streets be redeveloped as planned for in the Comprehensive Plan. A reminder of what the Plan calls for:

[The housing units in the Texas Streets] have been built too close together, without appropriate provision of open space, and without amenities. The maze-like character of the resulting development, its proximity to highly-traveled Little Creek Road and to Interstate – 64 make it unfortunately suitable for drug dealing and for serving as a base for other criminal activity. The Norfolk police report that the situation in these buildings is getting worse. They recommend major change: the acquisition and demolition of these buildings, before the situation has even more adverse impacts on the surrounding neighborhoods.

… we suggest a mixed use development, making use of the Uptown Norfolk concept, as described in the retail market analysis.This development would consist of a 200 room hotel and associated function rooms, restaurant and parking deck, at the most prominent location: the corner of Little Creek Road and Fort Worth Avenue. The room tower of the hotel would be visible from the Interstate, and would serve both the Uptown District and the Naval Base, which is only a short distance to the west on Little Creek Road. Norfolk’s Economic Development Department reports substantial developer interest in identifying a hotel site in the general Uptown area.

We show Fort Worth Avenue being widened to 100 feet, so that it can serve as the main street for local traffic within the new development. Little Creek Road provides access, but cars make turns into individual businesses from Fort Worth.

… we show 125,000 square feet of medium-box retail, as recommended by the economic analysis, plus 25,000 square feet of other stores, including a destination restaurant at the most prominent entrance location. Our finding is that this amount of potential retail development is feasible for the Uptown District now, even before the construction of the Wal-Mart.

The combination of the hotel, which provides a focus of activity at night, and the active retail and restaurant uses, should prevent this area from ever again becoming a focus of unlawful activity, and its excellent retail location will be put to a better use than drug dealing.

If at all possible, we recommend that the City work with the current owners of these properties to create a development corporation that will represent these owners in proportion to their land holdings. This proposal offers these owners a way out of an increasingly untenable situation.

In a second phase of development, the at-grade parking lots are replaced by 200 market-rate apartments, additional retail and some 40 town houses, making it a true mixed-use, 24-hour community. The apartments are 5-story elevator buildings, organized around a private courtyard, with their own secured garage, swimming pool and other amenities. They have restaurants and other retail on the portion of their ground floor facing Fort Worth Avenue. Buildings like this have worked well in other uptown districts, including Uptown Dallas. The parking lot to the south is replaced with individual town houses, with alley access to their own
garages. Houses and apartments something like this can be found in Norfolk’s West Freemason Street district downtown. While there is no waterfront nearby, this location has excellent access to the entire region, and could be a desirable residential address if a new environment is created as shown.

The Plan calls for the total redevelopment of the Texas Streets to a desirable living location that would include a large hotel, restaurants, and apartments in a mixed use setting. If Councilwoman Whibley would like to add a skate park or park to the plan, that is welcomed. But there is no reason not to move forward with purchasing land and redeveloping the Texas Streets.


Norfolk Tea Party 2 citizen survey

January 8, 2008

The Norfolk Tea Party is conducting a survey about real estate taxes and the effectiveness of Norfolk City Government. Please take a minute to complete this survey and mail it to: 3501 Orange Ave., Norfolk, VA 23513. Your survey must have a signature and address and be mailed by February 1, 2008.

Also, please feel free to reproduce the survey for your Civic League, family, friends and neighbors who are residents of Norfolk.
Mail completed surveys by *****February 1, 2008*****

You can obtain the survey by visiting www.NorfolkTeaParty2.org or clicking below

Norfolk Tea Party 2 Citizen Survey

Thank you for participating and for your help in continuing to make Norfolk a great place to live and work.


Norfolk City Manager’s husband dies after long illness

January 4, 2008

Pilot Online reports that Drew Williams, the husband of Norfolk City Manager Regina Williams, died Thursday after a long illness. Mr. Williams had been treated for more than a year for a severe colon infection. He was 66. Our condolences go out to Mrs. Williams and her family on their loss of a precious loved one.


Police identify man shot at Southern Shopping Center

January 3, 2008

The police have identified the man murdered on Monday in front of the Game Stop video game store as Jamal Matthews 21 year of age. The question begs would the politicians running our city government remain so silent if this cold blooded murder had taken place in their sacred downtown?

Pilot Online reports that the Police have charged a youth with the cold blooded murder:

The youth who was charged is 17, according to police. He was charged with murder and using a gun while committing a felony.

Investigators don’t know whether Matthews knew the person who shot him.

The youth was arraigned this morning in Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court.

Amanda Howie, a spokeswoman for the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, said prosecutors intend to prosecute the youth as an adult. He was ordered held in the city detention center pending a bond hearing on Jan. 9, she said.

According to an unconfirmed Police report, the youth was captured in Denby Park. Project Focus needs to focus on tearing this rat’s nest of crime to the ground.